Learn how you can help ensure that the principle of due process endures this crisis
Due Process Institute

8th Amendment Concerns

In Brief

The Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution states:

“Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.”

The Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment reflects a fundamental constitutional commitment to human dignity and limits on government power. That protection applies not only to the length of a sentence, but also to how people are treated while in custody. If the Constitution means what it says, it requires that incarceration not involve inhumane conditions, deliberate indifference to serious medical needs, or punishments that are grossly disproportionate.

Our Eighth Amendment work addresses a wide range of issues—from excessive sentences and unreasonable fines to unconstitutional conditions of confinement and barriers that prevent courts from holding officials accountable for serious misconduct. We advocate for reforms that ensure the Constitution’s protections remain meaningful for everyone in the criminal legal system.

Free from excessive bail, fines, and cruel and unusual punishment.

Our Constitution plainly forbids cruel and unusual punishment. It embodies the principle that the government’s authority to punish must always be constrained by basic standards of humanity and proportionality. Yet despite this clear constitutional command, courts have developed doctrines over time that frequently insulate unlawful punishment from scrutiny and make it harder for individuals to vindicate their rights.

As advocates for the Constitution, we believe these developments have eroded the Eighth Amendment’s protections—permitting excessive sentences, degrading conditions of confinement, and serious misconduct to persist without adequate accountability. Our work seeks to strengthen the Amendment’s guarantees and ensure that constitutional limits on punishment remain meaningful in practice.

We support:

  • the Smarter Pretrial Detention for Drug Charges Act, which would eliminate the unfair blanket presumption of pretrial detention for most federal drug charges
  • protection from excessive fines and considering a defendant’s ability to pay in determining whether it is constitutional
  • reigning in perserve state and federal forfeiture laws
  • protecting young adults from life without parole sentences

How We Work to Protect Your 8th Amendment Rights

Legislative Efforts

Due Process Institute works on the federal and state levels in support of meaningful 8th Amendment protections.
Advocacy

Amicus Briefs

Due Process Institute supports your 8th Amendment rights in America’s courts.
Litigation

Research

Interested in learning more about the many intrusions upon our 8th Amendment rights?
Research

Policy Impact

The Clyde-Hirsch-Sowers RESPECT Act (H.R. 1219 / S. 1099) was incorporated into the Taxpayer First Act and signed into federal law on July 10, 2019. This bill limited the IRS’ ability to seek forfeiture in cases where the only suspected crime is “structuring” rather than another crime for which structuring is used to conceal wrongdoing. 

Litigation Impact

Timbs v. Indiana centered around the civil forfeiture of the plaintiff’s $42,000 vehicle for a crime that had a maximum $10,000 criminal fine. Filed September 11, 2018 with Cato Institute, DKT Liberty Project, Federal Bar Association Civil Rights Section, Goldwater Institute, and Texas Public Policy Foundation.  

OUTCOME: The Supreme Court agreed with us and ruled 9-0 in favor of plaintiff Timbs, holding that the Excessive Fines Clause of the Eighth Amendment is incorporated to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment’s Due Process Clause. Read the opinion here.