Learn how you can help ensure that the principle of due process endures this crisis

DUE PROCESS INSTITUTE
DUE PROCESS INSTITUTE
  • Home
  • Our People
    • Leadership
    • Staff
    • Board
    • Employment Opportunities
  • Legislation
  • Amicus
  • Blog
  • Other Work
    • Our Impact
    • Transforming Prosecution
    • #WeThePeople
    • Juries Decide
    • Research
    • Constitution Day
    • Past Work, 2023-2024
    • Past Work, 2018-2023
    • Due Process Torch
    • COVID-19 Resources
  • Support
  • More
    • Home
    • Our People
      • Leadership
      • Staff
      • Board
      • Employment Opportunities
    • Legislation
    • Amicus
    • Blog
    • Other Work
      • Our Impact
      • Transforming Prosecution
      • #WeThePeople
      • Juries Decide
      • Research
      • Constitution Day
      • Past Work, 2023-2024
      • Past Work, 2018-2023
      • Due Process Torch
      • COVID-19 Resources
    • Support
  • Home
  • Our People
    • Leadership
    • Staff
    • Board
    • Employment Opportunities
  • Legislation
  • Amicus
  • Blog
  • Other Work
    • Our Impact
    • Transforming Prosecution
    • #WeThePeople
    • Juries Decide
    • Research
    • Constitution Day
    • Past Work, 2023-2024
    • Past Work, 2018-2023
    • Due Process Torch
    • COVID-19 Resources
  • Support

Pending "After the Plea/Trial" Amicus Briefs

United States v. Jackson

United States v. Jackson

United States v. Jackson

Amicus Brief in Support of Cross-Appellee

6th Circuit Court of Appeals

Filed Apr. 21, 2020


TOPICS: mandatory minimum sentences; FIRST STEP Act; resentencing


This brief argues that reforms to mandatory minimum sentences recently adopted by Congress in the First Step Act apply to defendants whose pre-Act sentences were vacated on appeal after the Act's adoption and that such individuals should receive the benefit of reforms Congress has passed. Filed with 


Read our brief

Hopkins v. Hosemann

United States v. Jackson

United States v. Jackson

Amicus Brief in Support of Appellees 

5th Circuit Court of Appeals

Filed Nov. 6, 2019


TOPIC: disenfranchisement


This brief tackles the issue of disenfranchisement of individuals who have  been convicted for certain crimes in Mississippi. We argue that the broad nature of the state's disenfranchisement practices are a violation of the 14th Amendment. Filed with 

Read our brief

Resolved "After the Plea/Trial" Cases

Community Success Initiative v. Moore

Community Success Initiative v. Moore

Community Success Initiative v. Moore

Amicus Brief in support of Plaintiffs 

Superior Court of Wake County

 Filed June 24, 2020


TOPICS: disenfranchisement; fines + fees


This brief challenges a law in North Carolina that bars individuals with any felony record from voting. In order to have the right restored, one must not only be discharged from probation, parole, and post-release supervision, but also have paid all court costs, fees, and restitution. Our brief discusses how the combined phenomena of overcriminalization and the growth of "user-funded" justice combine to make North Carolina's law unconstitutional. Filed with Cato Institute and R Street Institute.


OUTCOME: The Superior Court of Wake County agreed with us in part and granted summary judgement on the claim that North Carolina's statute barring individuals from voting simply because of a failure to pay fines and fees violated the state's Constitution. You can read the court's full order here. 

read our brief

Mearing v. United States

Community Success Initiative v. Moore

Community Success Initiative v. Moore

Amicus Brief in Support Certiorari 

U.S. Supreme Court 

Filed Oct. 5, 2018


TOPICS: appellate waiver; excessive fines + fees


Due Process Institute's Shana O'Toole authored this brief raising concerns over appellate waivers and also the unreasonable fines, fees, forfeitures, and restitution awards that are endemic in American's criminal justice system. 


For more information, visit our 8th Amendment Amicus Briefs collection.

Beltran Leyva v. United States

Community Success Initiative v. Moore

Beltran Leyva v. United States

Amicus Brief in support of Certiorari

U.S. Supreme Court

Filed Oct. 2019


TOPICS: confrontation clause; sentencing enhancements; relevant conduct; appellate standard of review


In this brief, we attempt to resolve a circuit split on the appropriate standard of review for sentencing enhancements based on unsworn out-of-court statements of cooperating witnesses, in favor of requiring de novo review. 


See more about this case in our 6th Amendment Amicus Briefs collection.



Copyright © 2024 Due Process Institute - All Rights Reserved.


Please note: contributions to Due Process Institute, a 501(c)(4), are not deductible for federal tax purposes.   

  • Home
  • Leadership
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Legislation
  • Amicus
  • Blog
  • Juries Decide
  • Research
  • Past Work, 2018-2023
  • Support
  • 5th Amendment
  • 6th Amendment

Powered by

Cookie Policy

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you accept our use of cookies.

DeclineAccept & Close