Learn how you can help ensure that the principle of due process endures this crisis

DUE PROCESS INSTITUTE
DUE PROCESS INSTITUTE
  • Home
  • Our People
    • Leadership
    • Staff
    • Board
    • Employment Opportunities
  • Legislation
  • Amicus
  • Blog
  • Other Work
    • Our Impact
    • Transforming Prosecution
    • #WeThePeople
    • Juries Decide
    • Research
    • Constitution Day
    • Past Work, 2023-2024
    • Past Work, 2018-2023
    • Due Process Torch
    • COVID-19 Resources
  • Support
  • More
    • Home
    • Our People
      • Leadership
      • Staff
      • Board
      • Employment Opportunities
    • Legislation
    • Amicus
    • Blog
    • Other Work
      • Our Impact
      • Transforming Prosecution
      • #WeThePeople
      • Juries Decide
      • Research
      • Constitution Day
      • Past Work, 2023-2024
      • Past Work, 2018-2023
      • Due Process Torch
      • COVID-19 Resources
    • Support
  • Home
  • Our People
    • Leadership
    • Staff
    • Board
    • Employment Opportunities
  • Legislation
  • Amicus
  • Blog
  • Other Work
    • Our Impact
    • Transforming Prosecution
    • #WeThePeople
    • Juries Decide
    • Research
    • Constitution Day
    • Past Work, 2023-2024
    • Past Work, 2018-2023
    • Due Process Torch
    • COVID-19 Resources
  • Support

The #JuriesDecide Campaign

How is it that a jury can find a person accused of a crime "not guilty" but that same defendant can be sentenced for that crime anyway? 


This is the problem of acquitted conduct sentencing--an unconstitutional practice Due Process Institute is working to abolish. 

What is Acquitted Conduct Sentencing?

“Acquitted conduct sentencing” is a practice that allows federal judges to sentence defendants based on charges for which a jury found them to be not guilty. It is a flagrant violation of numerous due process rights enumerated in the Constitution. Jurists across the ideological spectrum—from the late Justice Scalia to Justice Ginsburg—have condemned the practice for many years, but the Supreme Court has repeatedly failed to accept an appeal that would review the constitutionality of the practice. 


Abolishing acquitted conduct sentencing is a top priority of Due Process Institute. We are currently working on substantial research that will help advocates quantify and understand this issue better. Stay tuned to this page for new scholarship about the practice of acquitted conduct sentencing at both the federal and state levels!


We urge legislators on both sides of the aisle to bring this unfair and unconstitutional practice to an end before more Americans are sentenced to decades in a prison cell on the basis of unproven allegations that juries have heard and purposefully rejected.


Due Process Institute is grateful to work with many diverse allies who support the #JuriesDecide campaign as part of our bipartisan coalition as well as through their own efforts!

Learn More

What do Justices Scalia, Stevens, Ginsburg, Thomas, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and a DC juror have in common? 


Learn more about Juror #6 and the injustice that occurs when we don't let 

#JuriesDecide.

Read our blog

What We Are Doing to End Acquitted Conduct Sentencing

Legislative Work

Due Process Institute is working with a bipartisan coalition and members of Congress to pass legislation that would ensure #JuriesDecide.

Advocacy

Amicus Briefs

Due Process Institute seeks to abolish acquitted conduct sentencing in America's courts.

Litigation

Research

Research

The full impact of acquitted conduct sentencing is unknown given the limited data and awareness about this practice. Due Process Institute is seeking to provide a comprehensive picture of this practice through research. 

Education

Join the effort to abolish acquitted conduct sentencing!

In the News

"The Appeal" Highlights Problem of Acquitted Conduct Sentencing

Former MD Governor: Acquitted Conduct Should Not Be Considered At Sentencing

Former MD Governor: Acquitted Conduct Should Not Be Considered At Sentencing

Criminal justice reform news website "The Appeal" covered the issue of acquitted conduct sentencing, explaining the practice, why it's wrong, and the latest news about the bill Due Process Institute is supporting.


"Although this is a problem that will come as news to some, it is the rare one that can (and might) be remedied."

Learn more

Former MD Governor: Acquitted Conduct Should Not Be Considered At Sentencing

Former MD Governor: Acquitted Conduct Should Not Be Considered At Sentencing

Former MD Governor: Acquitted Conduct Should Not Be Considered At Sentencing

Robert Ehrlich, former governor of Maryland, writes in Law360 that acquitted conduct sentencing is wrong and that federal law is in need of serious reform. 


"The bottom line: Acquitted-conduct sentencing effectively divests individuals of their Sixth Amendment right to trial-by-jury by divesting citizens of their historical and constitutional role in the administration of criminal justice. "

Read here

Why a new common sense criminal justice reform bill must be passed into law

Former MD Governor: Acquitted Conduct Should Not Be Considered At Sentencing

Why a new common sense criminal justice reform bill must be passed into law

Writing in the Washington Times, editor David Keene says that acquitted conduct sentencing "throws out the guarantee that a defendant is to be judged by a 'jury of one’s peers,' makes a mockery of jury trials and the 'beyond a reasonable doubt' standard to which the prosecution is supposedly held in criminal cases." 

Find out more

#JuriesDecide Legislative Action

Bipartisan Criminal Justice Reform Bill Introduced

Due Process Institute applauds Senators Durbin and Grassley for once again serving as lead sponsors of a landmark bipartisan criminal justice reform bill--as well as co-sponsors Senators Leahy, Lee, Booker, and Tillis--and putting their political differences aside to work together for the good of the country by introducing--the Prohibiting Punishment of Acquitted Conduct Act of 2019 (S. 2566).  


#BipartisanWorks   #JuriesDecide

We are grateful for the support of many allies in endorsing this legislation!

  #Cut50; ALEC Action; Aleph Institute; ABA; ACLU; American Conservative Union; Americans for Prosperity; Americans for Tax Reform; Digital Liberty; Drug Policy Alliance;  Fair Trials; Faith and Freedom Coalition; FAMM; Federal Public & Community Defenders; Freedomworks; Innocence Project; Koch Industries; NACDL; National Legal Aid and Defender Association; Prison Fellowship; R Street Institute; Right on Crime; The Sentencing Project; Texas Public Policy Foundation; and Tzedek Association.

Read Senate Press Release Here

Statement in Support of Legislation from DPI's Founder + President

Statement in Support of Legislation from DPI's Founder + President

Statement in Support of Legislation from DPI's Founder + President



Read Our Statement Here

Understand the Bipartisan Bill

Statement in Support of Legislation from DPI's Founder + President

Statement in Support of Legislation from DPI's Founder + President



Read Our Fact Sheet Here

Prohibiting Punishment of Acquitted Conduct Act (S. 2566)

Statement in Support of Legislation from DPI's Founder + President

Prohibiting Punishment of Acquitted Conduct Act (S. 2566)



Read the Proposed Law

#JuriesDecide Litigation

Our Work In the Courts to Abolish the Practice

Cabrera-Rangel v. United States

Cabrera-Rangel v. United States

Cabrera-Rangel v. United States

Brief in Support of Certiorari 

U.S. Supreme Court 


petition for certiorari denied January 14, 2019

Cabrera-Rangel v U.S.

Asaro v. United States

Cabrera-Rangel v. United States

Cabrera-Rangel v. United States

Brief in Support of Certiorari

U.S. Supreme Court


petition for certiorari denied February 24, 2020 

Asaro v U.S.

#JuriesDecide Research

Preview: Our Research on Acquitted Conduct Sentencing

 

Forty states and the District of Columbia either explicitly or implicitly permit the use of acquitted conduct at sentencing. 

 

Only ten states have abolished the practice: Georgia, Hawaii, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oregon, and Washington. 


The method of prohibition varies. Georgia, Hawaii, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Hampshire, and North Carolina eliminated the practice via court decision; Minnesota, New Mexico, Oregon, and Washington did so via statutory or regulatory sentencing guidelines. The effect of the prohibitions in these ten states also varies depending on the particular sentencing regime the state employs. 


To understand the difficulty that will come with reforming the use of acquitted conduct sentencing at the state level, one needs to understand the various sentencing mechanisms used in the states since they feature substantial variations in both procedure and substance.  


Stay tuned for our comprehensive report!

Copyright © 2024 Due Process Institute - All Rights Reserved.


Please note: contributions to Due Process Institute, a 501(c)(4), are not deductible for federal tax purposes.   

  • Home
  • Leadership
  • Staff
  • Board
  • Legislation
  • Amicus
  • Blog
  • Juries Decide
  • Research
  • Past Work, 2018-2023
  • Support
  • 5th Amendment
  • 6th Amendment

Powered by

Cookie Policy

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you accept our use of cookies.

DeclineAccept & Close