Learn how you can help ensure that the principle of due process endures this crisis
Learn how you can help ensure that the principle of due process endures this crisis
Amicus Brief in support of Plaintiff
11th Circuit Court of Appeals
TOPICS: driver's license suspension; court-based debt
This amicus brief tackles the practical impacts of state policies that suspend a person's driver's license solely on account of court debt. These polices cause significant harm to economically disadvantaged people and are counterproductive for public safety, government revenue collection, and local economic growth. This brief summarizes the body of data that disfavors this practice. Filed July 7, 2020.
Amicus Brief in support of Plaintiffs
Superior Court of Wake County
TOPICS: disenfranchisement; fines + fees
This amicus brief challenges a law in North Carolina that bars individuals with any felony record from voting. In order to have the right restored, one must not only be discharged from probation, parole, and post-release supervision, but also have paid all court costs, fees, and restitution. Our brief discusses how the combined phenomena of overcriminalization and the growth of "user-funded" justice combine to make North Carolina's law unconstitutional. Filed June 24, 2020 with Cato Institute and R Street Institute.
Read more about this brief in our After the Plea/Trial Amicus Brief collection.
Amicus Brief in Support of Petitioner
U.S. Supreme Court
TOPICS: civil asset forfeiture; excessive fines + fees; incorporation
This case centered around the civil forfeiture of the plaintiff's $42,000 vehicle for a crime that had a maximum $10,000 criminal fine. Filed September 11, 2018 with Cato Institute, DKT Liberty Project, Federal Bar Association Civil Rights Section, Goldwater Institute, and Texas Public Policy Foundation.
OUTCOME: The Supreme Court agreed with us and ruled 9-0 in favor of plaintiff Timbs, holding that the Excessive Fines Clause of the Eighth Amendment is incorporated to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause. Read the opinion here.
Amicus Brief in Support Certiorari
U.S. Supreme Court
TOPICS: appellate waiver; excessive fines + fees
Due Process Institute's Shana O'Toole authored this brief raising concerns over appellate plea waivers and also the unreasonable fines, fees, forfeitures, and restitution awards that are endemic in American's criminal justice system. Filed Oct. 5, 2018.
OUTCOME: Unfortunately, the petition for certiorari denied on January 7, 2019.
Copyright © 2024 Due Process Institute - All Rights Reserved.
Please note: contributions to Due Process Institute, a 501(c)(4), are not deductible for federal tax purposes.
This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you accept our use of cookies.